This has been a great week to get the liberal message out to everyone. Mayors of two major American cities, Boston and Chicago, threaten to curtail Chick-fil-A operations if they can because president and chief operating officer Dan Cathy affirmed to an interviewer that he is "very much
supportive of the family -- the biblical definition of the family unit." In response to these and other Democrat liberals, hundreds of thousands of Americans responded to a Chick-fil-A appreciation day on Wednesday. On Friday, homosexual advocates, raging with anger over Mr. Cathy's "hateful" remarks, responded with "kiss-in" protests. Let's see, hundreds of thousands of American go to Chick-fil-A to do what people do at restaurants - order their meals and eat - and libs go to take up space and kiss. Yeah, it's their middle-finger "take that, America" moment. But, hey, that's the message that the liberals want Americans to know.
Now, during the most well-known international sporting event held, the Olympics, David Sirota, writing at salon.com, declares that liberals should not be chanting, "U.S.A.!" Yes, he means American liberals.
******
And yet, as I’ve grown older, I find my “U.S.A.!”-chanting reflex increasingly interrupted by pangs of discomfort, and not because I’m ashamed of our country or our Olympians, but because the relationship between American nationalism and the Olympics has been slowly infused with a different — and politicized — meaning. In short, chanting the initials of our nation seems less like it did in 1984 than it has since 1992.
******
Actually, Mr. Sirota DOES mean that we are to be ashamed of our great nation:
******
The hyper-patriotism surrounding the modern Olympics, then, is just a reflection of that national character. When that TV screen flashes the list of athletes and we inevitably profile the competitors by nation, we do so not just because we experience natural feelings of solidarity with fellow countrymen. We likely do so also because of that deeper desire to publicly showcase American preeminence — a desire we’ve been programmed to haughtily express since the end of the Cold War, a desire we’re led to believe we must express in this “love it or leave it” era for fear of being labeled traitors.
Missed in the ensuing red-white-and-blue hoopla, of course, is the fact that we are not so exceptional outside the Olympic village.
******
This is what passes for patriotism in the land of left-believe. Try not to forget that the next time you have a chance for voting for the men and women who hope to lead and shape this nation in accordance with their expressed ideologies.
Friday, August 03, 2012
Chick-Fil-A Day Follow Up
A write up by Todd Starnes gives some descriptions of plans to counter support for Chick-Fil-A. Watch the two minute embedded video to see a "non-hateful" response to this "hateful" corporation. The young lady at the window displayed remarkable composure.
Then, fast moving news circulating about Chick-Fil-A day reveals that Adam Smith's hate-filled rant (watch the video mentioned above) directed toward the young lady staffing a Chick-Fil-A drive thru window had consequences. Turns out, HIS employer did not like it...
Tucson executive loses job after confronting Chick-fil-A worker
Swift justice, to be sure. Many folks are probably applauding. But I doubt that anyone at Chick-Fil-A, especially executives, are hoping that anyone lose a job over any of this. They are just running a business to the best of their abilities. And they are successful at it.
I was thnking, though, how amazing - as in amazing grace - it would be if Chick-Fil-A execs offered him a job. Maybe not practical or even possible, but a thought anyway.
Liberals: self-declared heros of tolerance, fairness, and civility. Great with words, and then they act. Time for my bumper sticker reminder...
How to anger a conservative: Tell her a lie.
How to anger a liberal: Tell him the truth.
Then, fast moving news circulating about Chick-Fil-A day reveals that Adam Smith's hate-filled rant (watch the video mentioned above) directed toward the young lady staffing a Chick-Fil-A drive thru window had consequences. Turns out, HIS employer did not like it...
Tucson executive loses job after confronting Chick-fil-A worker
Swift justice, to be sure. Many folks are probably applauding. But I doubt that anyone at Chick-Fil-A, especially executives, are hoping that anyone lose a job over any of this. They are just running a business to the best of their abilities. And they are successful at it.
I was thnking, though, how amazing - as in amazing grace - it would be if Chick-Fil-A execs offered him a job. Maybe not practical or even possible, but a thought anyway.
Liberals: self-declared heros of tolerance, fairness, and civility. Great with words, and then they act. Time for my bumper sticker reminder...
How to anger a conservative: Tell her a lie.
How to anger a liberal: Tell him the truth.
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Marxist Label Is Adequate
Cary Brunswick writes that calling someone a “Marxist” alone does not make a valid
argument. Yet in our world of brief letters to the editor, tweets, and sound
bite media, expressions must be succinct. The use of widely known and accepted
“buzzwords,” however inadequate, is a necessity.
Happily, Mr. Brunswick, who openly and eagerly appropriates the label “Marxist” for himself, provides meaning to the word within his own column. He first attempts to describe Karl Marx’s ideology positively: “In reality, Marx was all about working people obtaining freedom from inhumane conditions that left them with little else in lives that were destitute and joyless, and the freedom to do what they do best and satisfy their basic human needs.” All well and good, but he later reveals how Marxism is actually implemented: “Universal health care would have appealed to Marx because he thought a strong central government was needed to plan a nation’s economy so industries produced the products that enlightened leaders thought the society needed.” Read that again, and let its full impact sink in. It is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that Marxism’s central planning mandate does not give way to the “freedom to do what they do best.” Think Cuba, for instance.
Mr. Brunswick admits that Marxism is associated with “dictators who squelched people’s freedoms,” but he attributes that to “transitions forced on societies that were not prepared for them.” Free societies are never “prepared” for Marxism; at least, not if they seek to remain free. So perhaps Mr. Brunswick should check back in ten thousand years to see if societies have become prepared for Marxism. In the meantime, as clarified by Mr. Brunswick, calling a proponent of central economic planning a “Marxist” alone is a most adequate argument.
Happily, Mr. Brunswick, who openly and eagerly appropriates the label “Marxist” for himself, provides meaning to the word within his own column. He first attempts to describe Karl Marx’s ideology positively: “In reality, Marx was all about working people obtaining freedom from inhumane conditions that left them with little else in lives that were destitute and joyless, and the freedom to do what they do best and satisfy their basic human needs.” All well and good, but he later reveals how Marxism is actually implemented: “Universal health care would have appealed to Marx because he thought a strong central government was needed to plan a nation’s economy so industries produced the products that enlightened leaders thought the society needed.” Read that again, and let its full impact sink in. It is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that Marxism’s central planning mandate does not give way to the “freedom to do what they do best.” Think Cuba, for instance.
Mr. Brunswick admits that Marxism is associated with “dictators who squelched people’s freedoms,” but he attributes that to “transitions forced on societies that were not prepared for them.” Free societies are never “prepared” for Marxism; at least, not if they seek to remain free. So perhaps Mr. Brunswick should check back in ten thousand years to see if societies have become prepared for Marxism. In the meantime, as clarified by Mr. Brunswick, calling a proponent of central economic planning a “Marxist” alone is a most adequate argument.
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Chick-Fil-A Day a Success!
Unfortunately, I do not have a Chick-Fil-A in my vicinity, or I would have gone today. As it is, we have vowed to go to one when we can. Nevertheless, support Chick-Fil-A day appears to be wildly successful. According to the newscast from Lafayette, there was a line at the store most of the day and cars lined up along SR 26 to get in.I have seen and heard other reports from other places around the state and country that indicate similar results.
I don't want to be overconfident, because that can breed carelessness and unintentional apathy. But this is a good sign. When liberals lay their ideas and plans out in the open daylight, Americans understand them for what they are... and they reject them. Americans reject tyranny.
Where did the "support Chick-Fil-A day" come from? CEO Dan Cathy made some comments concerning Biblical, traditional marriage in an interview on a Christian station. Somehow, the tolerate-everyone-except-conservative-Christian crowd got hold of it and sent it viral. An example of "hate speech," you see. Even the Muppets got into the act as Lisa Henson pulled its business relationship with Chick-Fil-A. So some businesses and some people choose not to patronize Chick-Fil-A because of the values forwarded by the company's CEO and employees. That's freedom of choice.
But two Mayors of American cities decided to politicize the whole affair. Mayor Thomas Menino of Boston and Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago both stated in their respective ways that they would like to keep Chick-Fil-A out of their cities. Mayor Emanuel even had the audacity to say that the Chick-Fil-A values are not "Chicago values." Actually, we can breathe a sigh of relief there. As Ben Shapiro remarked, "'Chick-fil-A's values are not Chicago's values,' said Emanuel of a city in which dead people vote and live people dodge bullets." Government leadership using the force of government to damage a legitimate business? That's tyranny! I suggest that Boston's Freedom Trail has no place for Mayor Menino, but plenty of room for a Chick-Fil-A (see Ben Shapiro's article for context).
As Americans wake up to the reality that liberals intend to impose their immorality on every American man, woman, and child; as they wake up to the reality that they intend to eliminate the Christian faith in America; and as they wake up to the reality that liberal politicians intend to use government force as much as possible to damage commerce with whom they disagree, then they respond in reasonable support and fashion for what is right.
I close with two Rush in a hurry comments:
"August 1st, 2012. It is our 24th anniversary here at the EIB Network, starting our 25th year today of talking about and celebrating the wonder ofAmerica . Also happening on August 1st, the Chick-fil-A Revolution. Supporting the right to voice your religious beliefs. That's what this is about. You have two Democrat mayors who essentially said Christians aren't desired in our towns." – Rush
"I'll tell you what's gonna happen on November 6th, Obama's gonna get Chick-fil-A'd himself." – Rush
The TEA kettle is on, and it's simmerin'.
I don't want to be overconfident, because that can breed carelessness and unintentional apathy. But this is a good sign. When liberals lay their ideas and plans out in the open daylight, Americans understand them for what they are... and they reject them. Americans reject tyranny.
Where did the "support Chick-Fil-A day" come from? CEO Dan Cathy made some comments concerning Biblical, traditional marriage in an interview on a Christian station. Somehow, the tolerate-everyone-except-conservative-Christian crowd got hold of it and sent it viral. An example of "hate speech," you see. Even the Muppets got into the act as Lisa Henson pulled its business relationship with Chick-Fil-A. So some businesses and some people choose not to patronize Chick-Fil-A because of the values forwarded by the company's CEO and employees. That's freedom of choice.
But two Mayors of American cities decided to politicize the whole affair. Mayor Thomas Menino of Boston and Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago both stated in their respective ways that they would like to keep Chick-Fil-A out of their cities. Mayor Emanuel even had the audacity to say that the Chick-Fil-A values are not "Chicago values." Actually, we can breathe a sigh of relief there. As Ben Shapiro remarked, "'Chick-fil-A's values are not Chicago's values,' said Emanuel of a city in which dead people vote and live people dodge bullets." Government leadership using the force of government to damage a legitimate business? That's tyranny! I suggest that Boston's Freedom Trail has no place for Mayor Menino, but plenty of room for a Chick-Fil-A (see Ben Shapiro's article for context).
As Americans wake up to the reality that liberals intend to impose their immorality on every American man, woman, and child; as they wake up to the reality that they intend to eliminate the Christian faith in America; and as they wake up to the reality that liberal politicians intend to use government force as much as possible to damage commerce with whom they disagree, then they respond in reasonable support and fashion for what is right.
I close with two Rush in a hurry comments:
"August 1st, 2012. It is our 24th anniversary here at the EIB Network, starting our 25th year today of talking about and celebrating the wonder of
"I'll tell you what's gonna happen on November 6th, Obama's gonna get Chick-fil-A'd himself." – Rush
The TEA kettle is on, and it's simmerin'.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Too Rich to Pass Up
As I express in my subject line, this is too rich to pass up.
Bobby Eberle, author of "The Loft" at GOPUSA, wrote that he is on the Obama campaign email list and received the latest fund-raising plea. Completely in character, Mr. Obama trashes the "wealthy" - at least, non-Democrat wealthy. In the fund-raiser e-mail, BHO declares that, "Our average donation was $53, and 98 percent of our donations were less than $250. In that same period, nearly 80 percent of the money Romney and the Republicans raised came from just 6 percent of the donations it received -- his campaign is being driven by a team of wealthy donors." As Mr. Eberle commented, the Obama math is meaningless. What can be said is that 2% of his donations therefore come from those giving more than $250. Democrats are not without their "team of wealthy donors."
Not long after reading the GOPUSA e-mail, I ran across Peter Heck's post, "Obama: Lobbyists Bad, Gay Porn Kingpins Good." As revealed by The Weekly Standard, our sitting president pblicly thanks one of his 2% donors, a fellow by the name of Terry Bean. According to the New York Post, "One of the 'bundlers' who has raised $50,000 to $100,000 for the Barack Obama presidential campaign is Terrence Bean, who once controlled the biggest producer of gay porn in America. Bean, the first gay on Sen. Obama's National Finance Committee, is the sole trustee of the Charles M. Holmes Foundation, which owned Falcon Studios, Jock Studios and Mustang Studios, the producers of about $10 million worth of all-male pornography a year."
Wow! After going around on the campaign trail and telling American entrepreneurs of all types that they are not responsible for their success, he chooses to pay public tribute to Mr. Bean for putting so much work into his fund-raising event.
And why not? Mr. Bean was active in Oregon election support for BHO in the previous campaign and is receiving his payback. Notes Jacob Reita, who Bean hired to help run the Obama campaign in Oregon, "There is no question that if Obama is elected our next president that we will have significant national LGBT legislation passed for the very first time. If he doesn't win, it won't happen. It's as simple as that."
Isn't it about time that the 2.4 million donors that BHO claims to have know who it is they're supporting?
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Test of Fire
Test of Fire You-Tube video is a powerful reminder for those who have values they want to see represented in the upcoming election to:
(a) Register to vote; and
(b) Vote!
God bless!
(a) Register to vote; and
(b) Vote!
God bless!
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Pushback on "You Didn't Build That"
![]() |
| Nice Media empire. You didn’t build that. From Scruffymale. |
It's refreshing to see the creative responses to being told that "you didn't build that!" A lot of pushback going on out there.
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Solution
Articles expressing concerns about trends in contemporary culture have been appearing consistently in my local newspaper. Recent topics include hateful racial remarks, coarse and vulgar comments, and cheating on assignments and tests in public schools and colleges.What becomes intuitively obvious to the most casual observer is that America's Founders were spot-on-target in their assessment of the required foundation upon which this Constitutional Republic form of government was built. All of them, to a person, expressed in some form their assumption of freedom's prerequisite. Gouverneur Morris was an author of the final draft of our Constitution. He originated the phrase, "We the people of the United States." Offering his experience in government formation to France, he wrote:
******
Religion is the only solid basis of good morals; therefore education should teach the precepts of religion, and the duties of man toward God."
******
In the modern rush to abandon America's foundational principles, is it any wonder that so many are perplexed and completely overwhelmed by this contemporary large-scale disregard for moral behavior?
Friday, July 20, 2012
Retiree Pensions Further Weakened
Given the opportunity to stand
up for responsible American savers and retirees, our federal government has
lately almost always done the opposite. President Obama recently signed into
law “The Surface Transportation Bill.” The bill’s intent, written in typical
incomprehensible language, is to fund transportation infrastructure programs
and keep the student loan interest rates low.
What the law accomplishes is
the further weakening of private pension plans across the nation. Employers are
authorized to contribute less money into their pension plans. Our cash depleted
government loves this because, since pension plan contributions are tax
deductible, more tax revenues will head their direction. Businesses like the
change because they can retain more of their earnings instead of tying them up
in pension funds.
Consider this frightening
fact: as of 2009, four out of five private pension funds were considered
underfunded by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Even worse, the
PGBC, our government’s “safety net” for retirees, has been underfunded every
year since 2002. Those who have had their private pensions sent over to the
PBGC can let us know how well that is working out for them.
In the end, we now have yet
another law that assaults the individual liberties of hard-working, responsible
American citizens by making it more and more difficult for us to plan and
maintain our own financial futures. How long are we willing to allow this
inevitable train wreck to gather speed? Isn’t it about time to wake up to the
reality that we are taxed and regulated enough already?
Reference: Nilus Mattive, "Another Way Washington Just Robbed Retirees," July 17, 2012
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Important News
Breaking News! Breaking News!
The American economy is still on the ropes. Mr. Ben Bernanke warns that we remain on the edge of recession.
Americans continue to struggle in the job market.
Tensions in the Middle East continue to simmer.
But what was important news on the presidential front? The kiss-cam, of course!
I offer my personal kudos to President Obama for kissing Mrs. Obama.
It must be important... Big Media reports it!
The American economy is still on the ropes. Mr. Ben Bernanke warns that we remain on the edge of recession.
Americans continue to struggle in the job market.
Tensions in the Middle East continue to simmer.
But what was important news on the presidential front? The kiss-cam, of course!
I offer my personal kudos to President Obama for kissing Mrs. Obama.
It must be important... Big Media reports it!
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Edge of Societal Evolution July 18, 2012
Some of the latest from Rush Limbaugh:
******
"I don't care what Mitt Romney is doing with HIS money. Capital 'H,' capital 'I,' capital 'S.' HIS money. I don't care what you are doing with YOUR money. I don't care. What I care about is what Obama is doing with all of OUR money." -Rush
"Let there be no doubt what Obama's main intentions are. Let there be no doubt that all of this economic disaster is not coincidence and not an accident. There is no way." -Rush
"Obama is saying there's nothing special about successful people. It's such a different message. When I was growing up, you wanted to be one of those people. You wanted to emulate those people. You wanted to find out: What was it that made them successful?" -Rush
"I think it can now be said, without equivocation -- without equivocation -- that this man hates this country. He is trying -- Barack Obama is trying -- to dismantle, brick by brick, the American dream." -Rush
"The Democrat Party is a party that grows as people suffer. It's a party that expands its power as more and more people have their lives ruined in the sense that they cannot provide for themselves." -Rush
******
Dare we continue heading in the direction of the ruinous policies of liberalism?
******
"I don't care what Mitt Romney is doing with HIS money. Capital 'H,' capital 'I,' capital 'S.' HIS money. I don't care what you are doing with YOUR money. I don't care. What I care about is what Obama is doing with all of OUR money." -Rush
"Let there be no doubt what Obama's main intentions are. Let there be no doubt that all of this economic disaster is not coincidence and not an accident. There is no way." -Rush
"Obama is saying there's nothing special about successful people. It's such a different message. When I was growing up, you wanted to be one of those people. You wanted to emulate those people. You wanted to find out: What was it that made them successful?" -Rush
"I think it can now be said, without equivocation -- without equivocation -- that this man hates this country. He is trying -- Barack Obama is trying -- to dismantle, brick by brick, the American dream." -Rush
"The Democrat Party is a party that grows as people suffer. It's a party that expands its power as more and more people have their lives ruined in the sense that they cannot provide for themselves." -Rush
******
Dare we continue heading in the direction of the ruinous policies of liberalism?
Thursday, July 05, 2012
Higher Learning
One of the many deceptions forwarded by modern Christian opponents is that Christianity equals anti-intellectualism. I am not here suggesting that without Christianity, Western civilization would not be as advanced as it is. Attempts to define alterations to history in the absence of another historical reality are always speculative. So the best-known facts remain the best means of determining cause and effect. The reality of the development of education throughout Europe and then across the Atlantic to the Americas is that Christians prized and valued education. Many of the most prestigious institutions of higher learning today owe their existence to the zeal of Christian colonists to establish centers of education.
John Eliot, a Puritan and one of the early advocates for the founding of Harvard College in Massachusetts, wrote, "After God had carried us safe to New England and we had builded our houses, provided necessaries for our liveli-hood, rear'd convenient places for God's worship, and settled the Civil Government: One of the next things we longed for and looked after was to advance Learning and perpetuate it to posterity; dreading to leave an illiterate ministry to the churches, when our present Ministers shall lie in the Dust." (New England's First Fruits, 1643)
Wednesday, July 04, 2012
That Which We Celebrate
Declaration of Independence
[Adopted
in Congress 4 July 1776]
The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That
to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of
government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to
alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation
on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will
dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and
transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are
more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves
by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of
abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to
reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the
necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a
history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let
facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and
necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate
and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent
should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend
to them. He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large
districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of
representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable
to tyrants only. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual,
uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the
sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. He has
dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness
his invasions on the rights of the people. He has refused for a long time,
after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative
powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for
their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers
of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has endeavored to prevent
the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for
naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration
hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands. He has
obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for
establishing judiciary powers. He has made judges dependent on his will alone,
for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He
has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to
harass our people, and eat out their substance. He has kept among us, in times
of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature. He has
affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power. He
has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our
constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts
of pretended legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any
murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states: For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing taxes on us without our consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:
For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his
protection and waging war against us. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our
coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is at this
time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of
death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy
scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totaly unworth the head of
a civilized nation. He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the
high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of
their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands. He has
excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the
inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of
warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. In
every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most
humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated
injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define
a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have we been wanting
in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of
attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us.
We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement
here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have
conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which,
would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. We must,
therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold
them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America,
in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for
the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the
good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united
colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they
are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political
connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be
totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full
power to levey war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and
to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And
for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of
Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and
our sacred honor.
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
Seeds of Liberty
"For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery... It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country... Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt... An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left to us! ...Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of Nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the Holy cause of Liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry, address at the Second Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Obamadoesn'tcare
Well, well, well. The Obamadoesn'tcare healthcare diktat passed muster with the Supreme Court. I'm a bit surprised by that.
I'm not surprised with the response. Responsible Americans are not liking this. Rightfully so. They see what is coming: increasing taxes to pay for the healthcare of the irresponsible.
Don't think responsible, hard-working, normal Americans don't know this? Try this Market Talk response earlier in the day:
*****
*****
Inevitable fallout from the Obamadoesn'tcare diktat includes higher prices to cover fewer employees. Oh, things will settle out, and our grand citizens from the land of left-believe will tell us that all the fuss was made up. But things will settle out a few notches below our current standard of living, as it always does. The liberal elite will get richer, and the rest of America will face fewer amenities.
So, my friends, want to see where your healthcare dollars are heading? Try this bizarre behavior on for size:
*****
Our Obamadoesn'tcare diktat tax dollars at work.
The TEA kettle is on, just a matter of time now.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
America's Founding Freedom
"The Puritan movement was essentially democratic. Every individual stood without distinction of rank or fortune before his God... Here, and not in Rousseau or the teachings of French philosophy, is the origin of the doctrine of the rights of man, and the establishment of government upon these principles was the beginning of a new social order." -- E. Parmalee Prentice, "The New opportunity of the Small College," Harper's New Monthly Magazine, 123
"Puritanism was not merely a religious doctrine, but corresponded in many points with the most absolute democratic and republican theories. It was this tendency which had aroused its most dangerous adversaries." -- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, New York: Appleton, 1904
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
The March to Tyranny
"If the president of the United States can choose to enforce or not enforce a law because he likes them or doesn't like them, what about us? We don't have the ability to choose which laws we obey or not. Without consequence. He does. The only consequence for him is at the ballot box." -Rush Limbaugh, 6/25/2012
"It's a dictator's wet dream to do what Obama is doing. If he doesn't agree with the law, voila, it's no longer enforced. It may as well not even exist. That's who he is, folks." -Rush Limbaugh, 6/25/2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
Liberal Racism
"Abortion is the white supremacist's best friend." -- Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., on a Department of Homeland Security domestic terrorism report that links pro-lifers and hate groups.
King said, "To say, as the Department of Homeland Security does, that white supremacists have exercised a 'longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion' tells me that either the government, the supremacists, or both are clueless about abortion's impact on the black community."
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Supreme Court Justices Confirm Christian Faith
"The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahomedansim, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government. It thus cut off the means of religious persecution (the vice and pest of former ages), and of the subversion of the rights of conscience in matters of religion which had been trampled upon almost from the days of the Apostles to the present age... Probably at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, and of the first amendment to it... the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America was that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the State, so far as was not incompatible with the previous rights of conscience and the freedom of religious worship. An attempt to level all religions and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation." -- Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, sections 1874, 1877.
"Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." -- John Jay, first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, October 12, 1816.
Thursday, December 02, 2010
Demise of the Dollar
Ultra-liberal columnist Stephen Dick exposes his complete lack of understanding an issue yet again. He recently wrote in defense of the Federal Reserve’s announcement to buy another $600 billion of debt. Mr. Dick blasts anyone who dare suggests that this is a bad idea (in his land of left-believe world, the only opposition comes from the GOP).
On an emotional level, Mr. Dick’s and Mr. Bernanke’s sentiment is admirable: spur economic recovery and get businesses hiring. The sad truth is that in order for this to actually work, all normal economic sense must be suspended.
Independent analysts at Weiss Market Research indicate that the Fed’s move is not without its cost. Indeed, Larry Edelson calls the Fed’s action a “big fat lie:”
******
Here’s why:
First, because the whole concept of “buying Treasuries” is a smokescreen. What Bernanke is really doing is running the money printing presses, and it’s no secret. Even the emperor himself knows he has no clothes.
Second, because Bernanke also knows — all too well — that he’s not truly pumping money INTO the U.S. economy. In reality, the U.S. economy is leaking like a sieve. So for all practical purposes, he’s pumping the money OUT OF the U.S. economy — to countries overseas.
Third and most important, the “big number” — $600 billion — is meaningless. The Fed says quite bluntly that they will … “regularly review and adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.” In other words, they’ll blow right past the $600 billion mark whenever and however they darn please.
******
The biggest bottom line is that the Fed’s action intentionally devalues the dollar. Saving for the future? Have parents or grandparents living off of their fixed income? Those precious U.S. dollars will be worth less as commodity prices rise.
Now liberals like Mr. Dick stampede to ridicule talk of inflation as nothing but made-up mythological apocalyptic crazy-talk from those dastardly Republicans:
******
The congressman from my district, Mike Pence, wants to see Congress strip the Fed’s mandate on unemployment and concentrate on inflation. There are a lot of problems with this, but start with the fact inflation is almost nonexistent.
******
Then in typical liberal fashion, he immediately contradicts himself as he writes:
******
(I know, anyone who goes to the grocery or to get gas or to a movie might argue with this.)
******
There is a reason we “might” argue with this: inflation is real. Although not reflected through the magic of the official government numbers – yet – commodity futures prices have already accelerated upward. Four commodity futures indexes tracked by Bloomberg show that new highs have been reached in late October to early November. Even though they have backed off since then, the uptrend remains in place. Global demand and a devalued dollar will be a bitter pill for the average American to swallow. Martin Weiss offers this sobering conclusion:
******
Recession is actually the LESSER of the evils! Turning to the possible government responses to the problem, the CBO follows Dad’s logic almost to the letter, writing that
…Bankruptcy — defaulting on U.S. debt — would be a disaster, making it extremely difficult for America to borrow for many years to come.
Cheating and stealing (e.g., printing money) — which, as Mike Larson explained on Friday, now seems to be what Fed Chairman Bernanke favors — would also be a huge mistake, again making it much harder for the U.S. to borrow in the future.
In conclusion, the ONLY viable option, says the CBO, is … austerity. Yes, they admit, it would have negative consequences, driving the economy into a deeper recession. But, they say, a deeper recession would be the lesser of the evils.
This is the urgent dilemma America faces right now: Do we want to continue playing games with our money … or do we want to treat it with the respect it deserves?
If we do the wrong thing, we will doom future generations — and ourselves — to impoverishment. If we do the right thing, more economic pain is inevitable. But outside the fantasyland of Washington and Wall Street, it’s the only viable option.
******
Mr. Dick can believe what he wants, but economic reality will, without doubt, have the final say.
On an emotional level, Mr. Dick’s and Mr. Bernanke’s sentiment is admirable: spur economic recovery and get businesses hiring. The sad truth is that in order for this to actually work, all normal economic sense must be suspended.
Independent analysts at Weiss Market Research indicate that the Fed’s move is not without its cost. Indeed, Larry Edelson calls the Fed’s action a “big fat lie:”
******
Here’s why:
First, because the whole concept of “buying Treasuries” is a smokescreen. What Bernanke is really doing is running the money printing presses, and it’s no secret. Even the emperor himself knows he has no clothes.
Second, because Bernanke also knows — all too well — that he’s not truly pumping money INTO the U.S. economy. In reality, the U.S. economy is leaking like a sieve. So for all practical purposes, he’s pumping the money OUT OF the U.S. economy — to countries overseas.
Third and most important, the “big number” — $600 billion — is meaningless. The Fed says quite bluntly that they will … “regularly review and adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.” In other words, they’ll blow right past the $600 billion mark whenever and however they darn please.
******
The biggest bottom line is that the Fed’s action intentionally devalues the dollar. Saving for the future? Have parents or grandparents living off of their fixed income? Those precious U.S. dollars will be worth less as commodity prices rise.
Now liberals like Mr. Dick stampede to ridicule talk of inflation as nothing but made-up mythological apocalyptic crazy-talk from those dastardly Republicans:
******
The congressman from my district, Mike Pence, wants to see Congress strip the Fed’s mandate on unemployment and concentrate on inflation. There are a lot of problems with this, but start with the fact inflation is almost nonexistent.
******
Then in typical liberal fashion, he immediately contradicts himself as he writes:
******
(I know, anyone who goes to the grocery or to get gas or to a movie might argue with this.)
******
There is a reason we “might” argue with this: inflation is real. Although not reflected through the magic of the official government numbers – yet – commodity futures prices have already accelerated upward. Four commodity futures indexes tracked by Bloomberg show that new highs have been reached in late October to early November. Even though they have backed off since then, the uptrend remains in place. Global demand and a devalued dollar will be a bitter pill for the average American to swallow. Martin Weiss offers this sobering conclusion:
******
Recession is actually the LESSER of the evils! Turning to the possible government responses to the problem, the CBO follows Dad’s logic almost to the letter, writing that
…Bankruptcy — defaulting on U.S. debt — would be a disaster, making it extremely difficult for America to borrow for many years to come.
Cheating and stealing (e.g., printing money) — which, as Mike Larson explained on Friday, now seems to be what Fed Chairman Bernanke favors — would also be a huge mistake, again making it much harder for the U.S. to borrow in the future.
In conclusion, the ONLY viable option, says the CBO, is … austerity. Yes, they admit, it would have negative consequences, driving the economy into a deeper recession. But, they say, a deeper recession would be the lesser of the evils.
This is the urgent dilemma America faces right now: Do we want to continue playing games with our money … or do we want to treat it with the respect it deserves?
If we do the wrong thing, we will doom future generations — and ourselves — to impoverishment. If we do the right thing, more economic pain is inevitable. But outside the fantasyland of Washington and Wall Street, it’s the only viable option.
******
Mr. Dick can believe what he wants, but economic reality will, without doubt, have the final say.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















