Thursday, July 26, 2012

Too Rich to Pass Up

 
As I express in my subject line, this is too rich to pass up.
Bobby Eberle, author of "The Loft" at GOPUSA, wrote that he is on the Obama campaign email list and received the latest fund-raising plea. Completely in character, Mr. Obama trashes the "wealthy" - at least, non-Democrat wealthy. In the fund-raiser e-mail, BHO declares that, "Our average donation was $53, and 98 percent of our donations were less than $250. In that same period, nearly 80 percent of the money Romney and the Republicans raised came from just 6 percent of the donations it received -- his campaign is being driven by a team of wealthy donors." As Mr. Eberle commented, the Obama math is meaningless. What can be said is that 2% of his donations therefore come from those giving more than $250. Democrats are not without their "team of wealthy donors."
Not long after reading the GOPUSA e-mail, I ran across Peter Heck's post, "Obama: Lobbyists Bad, Gay Porn Kingpins Good." As revealed by The Weekly Standard, our sitting president pblicly thanks one of his 2% donors, a fellow by the name of Terry Bean. According to the New York Post, "One of the 'bundlers' who has raised $50,000 to $100,000 for the Barack Obama presidential campaign is Terrence Bean, who once controlled the biggest producer of gay porn in America. Bean, the first gay on Sen. Obama's National Finance Committee, is the sole trustee of the Charles M. Holmes Foundation, which owned Falcon Studios, Jock Studios and Mustang Studios, the producers of about $10 million worth of all-male pornography a year."

Wow! After going around on the campaign trail and telling American entrepreneurs of all types that they are not responsible for their success, he chooses to pay public tribute to Mr. Bean for putting so much work into his fund-raising event.
And why not? Mr. Bean was active in Oregon election support for BHO in the previous campaign and is receiving his payback. Notes Jacob Reita, who Bean hired to help run the Obama campaign in Oregon, "There is no question that if Obama is elected our next president that we will have significant national LGBT legislation passed for the very first time. If he doesn't win, it won't happen. It's as simple as that."
Isn't it about time that the 2.4 million donors that BHO claims to have know who it is they're supporting?

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Test of Fire

Test of Fire You-Tube video is a powerful reminder for those who have values they want to see represented in the upcoming election to:

(a) Register to vote; and
(b) Vote!

God bless!

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Pushback on "You Didn't Build That"


Nice Media empire. You didn’t build that. From Scruffymale.



It's refreshing to see the creative responses to being told that "you didn't build that!" A lot of pushback going on out there.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Solution

Articles expressing concerns about trends in contemporary culture have been appearing consistently in my local newspaper. Recent topics include hateful racial remarks, coarse and vulgar comments, and cheating on assignments and tests in public schools and colleges.

What becomes intuitively obvious to the most casual observer is that America's Founders were spot-on-target in their assessment of the required foundation upon which this Constitutional Republic form of government was built. All of them, to a person, expressed in some form their assumption of freedom's prerequisite. Gouverneur Morris was an author of the final draft of our Constitution. He originated the phrase, "We the people of the United States." Offering his experience in government formation to France, he wrote:

******
Religion is the only solid basis of good morals; therefore education should teach the precepts of religion, and the duties of man toward God."

******

In the modern rush to abandon America's foundational principles, is it any wonder that so many are perplexed and completely overwhelmed by this contemporary large-scale disregard for moral behavior?

Friday, July 20, 2012

Retiree Pensions Further Weakened

Given the opportunity to stand up for responsible American savers and retirees, our federal government has lately almost always done the opposite. President Obama recently signed into law “The Surface Transportation Bill.” The bill’s intent, written in typical incomprehensible language, is to fund transportation infrastructure programs and keep the student loan interest rates low.

What the law accomplishes is the further weakening of private pension plans across the nation. Employers are authorized to contribute less money into their pension plans. Our cash depleted government loves this because, since pension plan contributions are tax deductible, more tax revenues will head their direction. Businesses like the change because they can retain more of their earnings instead of tying them up in pension funds.

Consider this frightening fact: as of 2009, four out of five private pension funds were considered underfunded by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Even worse, the PGBC, our government’s “safety net” for retirees, has been underfunded every year since 2002. Those who have had their private pensions sent over to the PBGC can let us know how well that is working out for them.

In the end, we now have yet another law that assaults the individual liberties of hard-working, responsible American citizens by making it more and more difficult for us to plan and maintain our own financial futures. How long are we willing to allow this inevitable train wreck to gather speed? Isn’t it about time to wake up to the reality that we are taxed and regulated enough already?

Reference: Nilus Mattive, "Another Way Washington Just Robbed Retirees," July 17, 2012

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Important News

Breaking News! Breaking News!

The American economy is still on the ropes. Mr. Ben Bernanke warns that we remain on the edge of recession.

Americans continue to struggle in the job market.

Tensions in the Middle East continue to simmer.

But what was important news on the presidential front? The kiss-cam, of course!

I offer my personal kudos to President Obama for kissing Mrs. Obama.

It must be important... Big Media reports it!

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Edge of Societal Evolution July 18, 2012

Some of the latest from Rush Limbaugh:

******
"I don't care what Mitt Romney is doing with HIS money. Capital 'H,' capital 'I,' capital 'S.' HIS money. I don't care what you are doing with YOUR money. I don't care. What I care about is what Obama is doing with all of OUR money." -Rush

"Let there be no doubt what Obama's main intentions are.  Let there be no doubt that all of this economic disaster is not coincidence and not an accident.  There is no way." -Rush

"Obama is saying there's nothing special about successful people. It's  such a different message. When I was growing up, you wanted to be one of those  people. You wanted to emulate those people. You wanted to find out: What was it  that made them successful?" -Rush

"I think it can now be said, without equivocation -- without equivocation -- that this man hates this country. He is trying -- Barack Obama is trying -- to dismantle, brick by brick, the American dream." -Rush
 
"The Democrat Party is a party that grows as people suffer. It's a party that expands its power as more and more people have their lives ruined in the sense that they cannot provide for themselves." -Rush

******

Dare we continue heading in the direction of the ruinous policies of liberalism?

Thursday, July 05, 2012

Higher Learning


One of the many deceptions forwarded by modern Christian opponents is that Christianity equals anti-intellectualism. I am not here suggesting that without Christianity, Western civilization would not be as advanced as it is. Attempts to define alterations to history in the absence of another historical reality are always speculative. So the best-known facts remain the best means of determining cause and effect. The reality of the development of education throughout Europe and then across the Atlantic to the Americas is that Christians prized and valued education. Many of the most prestigious institutions of higher learning today owe their existence to the zeal of Christian colonists to establish centers of education.

John Eliot, a Puritan and one of the early advocates for the founding of Harvard College in Massachusetts, wrote, "After God had carried us safe to New England and we had builded our houses, provided necessaries for our liveli-hood, rear'd convenient places for God's worship, and settled the Civil Government: One of the next things we longed for and looked after was to advance Learning and perpetuate it to posterity; dreading to leave an illiterate ministry to the churches, when our present Ministers shall lie in the Dust." (New England's First Fruits, 1643)

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

That Which We Celebrate


Declaration of Independence

[Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776]



The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America


When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. 
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands. He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers. He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance. He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature. He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing taxes on us without our consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:
For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totaly unworth the head of a civilized nation. He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levey war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.


Tuesday, July 03, 2012

Seeds of Liberty


"For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery... It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country... Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt... An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left to us! ...Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of Nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the Holy cause of Liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry, address at the Second Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Obamadoesn'tcare


Well, well, well. The Obamadoesn'tcare healthcare diktat passed muster with the Supreme Court. I'm a bit surprised by that.

I'm not surprised with the response. Responsible Americans are not liking this. Rightfully so. They see what is coming: increasing taxes to pay for the healthcare of the irresponsible.

Don't think responsible, hard-working, normal Americans don't know this? Try this Market Talk response earlier in the day:

*****
 11:34 EDT - The Supreme Court's health-care decision doesn't bode well for restaurants. Industry groups have said the insurance-coverage mandate will cost them a lot of money in labor expenses and reorganization of their operations. Heavily franchised chains may see a bigger impact as higher costs could make it more difficult for franchisees to build or buy more locations. In the S&P 500, recently hit Chipotle (CMG) is down another 3% while YUM falls 2% and Starbucks (SBUX) drops 1.5%.
*****

Inevitable fallout from the Obamadoesn'tcare diktat includes higher prices to cover fewer employees. Oh, things will settle out, and our grand citizens from the land of left-believe will tell us that all the fuss was made up. But things will settle out a few notches below our current standard of living, as it always does. The liberal elite will get richer, and the rest of America will face fewer amenities.

So, my friends, want to see where your healthcare dollars are heading? Try this bizarre behavior on for size:

*****

  • Bug chasing. Another disturbing phenomenon among some MSM (men who have sex with men) involves HIV-negative MSM who actively seek HIV infection by engaging in high-risk sexual activities with infected male partners. A 2003 Rolling Stone article brought national attention to “bug-chasing,” which the article described as “an intricate underground world that has sprouted, driven almost completely by the Internet, in which men who want to be infected with HIV get together with those willing to infect them.” Carlos, a “bug chaser” who claimed to have had several hundred sexual partners and said he regularly had sex with three or four HIV-positive men a week, told Rolling Stone, “I know what the risks are…But I think it turns the other guy on to know that I’m negative and that they’re bringing me into the brotherhood. That gets me off, too.” (Freeman, Geoffery, “Bug Chasers: The men who long to be HIV+,” Rolling Stone magazine, February 6, 2003.)
  • *****

    Our Obamadoesn'tcare diktat tax dollars at work.

    The TEA kettle is on, just a matter of time now.

    Wednesday, June 27, 2012

    America's Founding Freedom


    "The Puritan movement was essentially democratic. Every individual stood without distinction of rank or fortune before his God... Here, and not in Rousseau or the teachings of French philosophy, is the origin of the doctrine of the rights of man, and the establishment of government upon these principles was the beginning of a new social order." -- E. Parmalee Prentice, "The New opportunity of the Small College," Harper's New Monthly Magazine, 123

    "Puritanism was not merely a religious doctrine, but corresponded in many points with the most absolute democratic and republican theories. It was this tendency which had aroused its most dangerous adversaries." -- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, New York: Appleton, 1904

    Tuesday, June 26, 2012

    The March to Tyranny


    "If the president of the United States can choose to enforce or not enforce a law because he likes them or doesn't like them, what about us?  We don't have the ability to choose which laws we obey or not.  Without consequence.  He does.  The only consequence for him is at the ballot box." -Rush Limbaugh, 6/25/2012

    "It's a dictator's wet dream to do what Obama is doing.  If he doesn't agree with the law, voila, it's no longer enforced.  It may as well not even exist.  That's who he is, folks." -Rush Limbaugh, 6/25/2012

    Monday, June 25, 2012

    Liberal Racism


    "Abortion is the white supremacist's best friend." -- Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., on a Department of Homeland Security domestic terrorism report that links pro-lifers and hate groups.

    King said, "To say, as the Department of Homeland Security does, that white supremacists have exercised a 'longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion' tells me that either the government, the supremacists, or both are clueless about abortion's impact on the black community."

    Sunday, June 24, 2012

    Supreme Court Justices Confirm Christian Faith


    "The real object of the First Amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahomedansim, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government. It thus cut off the means of religious persecution (the vice and pest of former ages), and of the subversion of the rights of conscience in matters of religion which had been trampled upon almost from the days of the Apostles to the present age... Probably at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, and of the first amendment to it... the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America was that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the State, so far as was not incompatible with the previous rights of conscience and the freedom of religious worship. An attempt to level all religions and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation." -- Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, sections 1874, 1877.


    "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." -- John Jay, first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, October 12, 1816.

    Thursday, December 02, 2010

    Demise of the Dollar

    Ultra-liberal columnist Stephen Dick exposes his complete lack of understanding an issue yet again. He recently wrote in defense of the Federal Reserve’s announcement to buy another $600 billion of debt. Mr. Dick blasts anyone who dare suggests that this is a bad idea (in his land of left-believe world, the only opposition comes from the GOP).

    On an emotional level, Mr. Dick’s and Mr. Bernanke’s sentiment is admirable: spur economic recovery and get businesses hiring. The sad truth is that in order for this to actually work, all normal economic sense must be suspended.

    Independent analysts at Weiss Market Research indicate that the Fed’s move is not without its cost. Indeed, Larry Edelson calls the Fed’s action a “big fat lie:”

    ******
    Here’s why:

    First, because the whole concept of “buying Treasuries” is a smokescreen. What Bernanke is really doing is running the money printing presses, and it’s no secret. Even the emperor himself knows he has no clothes.

    Second, because Bernanke also knows — all too well — that he’s not truly pumping money INTO the U.S. economy. In reality, the U.S. economy is leaking like a sieve. So for all practical purposes, he’s pumping the money OUT OF the U.S. economy — to countries overseas.

    Third and most important, the “big number” — $600 billion — is meaningless. The Fed says quite bluntly that they will … “regularly review and adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.” In other words, they’ll blow right past the $600 billion mark whenever and however they darn please.
    ******

    The biggest bottom line is that the Fed’s action intentionally devalues the dollar. Saving for the future? Have parents or grandparents living off of their fixed income? Those precious U.S. dollars will be worth less as commodity prices rise.

    Now liberals like Mr. Dick stampede to ridicule talk of inflation as nothing but made-up mythological apocalyptic crazy-talk from those dastardly Republicans:

    ******
    The congressman from my district, Mike Pence, wants to see Congress strip the Fed’s mandate on unemployment and concentrate on inflation. There are a lot of problems with this, but start with the fact inflation is almost nonexistent.
    ******

    Then in typical liberal fashion, he immediately contradicts himself as he writes:

    ******
    (I know, anyone who goes to the grocery or to get gas or to a movie might argue with this.)
    ******

    There is a reason we “might” argue with this: inflation is real. Although not reflected through the magic of the official government numbers – yet – commodity futures prices have already accelerated upward. Four commodity futures indexes tracked by Bloomberg show that new highs have been reached in late October to early November. Even though they have backed off since then, the uptrend remains in place. Global demand and a devalued dollar will be a bitter pill for the average American to swallow. Martin Weiss offers this sobering conclusion:

    ******
    Recession is actually the LESSER of the evils! Turning to the possible government responses to the problem, the CBO follows Dad’s logic almost to the letter, writing that

    …Bankruptcy — defaulting on U.S. debt — would be a disaster, making it extremely difficult for America to borrow for many years to come.

    Cheating and stealing (e.g., printing money) — which, as Mike Larson explained on Friday, now seems to be what Fed Chairman Bernanke favors — would also be a huge mistake, again making it much harder for the U.S. to borrow in the future.

    In conclusion, the ONLY viable option, says the CBO, is … austerity. Yes, they admit, it would have negative consequences, driving the economy into a deeper recession. But, they say, a deeper recession would be the lesser of the evils.

    This is the urgent dilemma America faces right now: Do we want to continue playing games with our money … or do we want to treat it with the respect it deserves?

    If we do the wrong thing, we will doom future generations — and ourselves — to impoverishment. If we do the right thing, more economic pain is inevitable. But outside the fantasyland of Washington and Wall Street, it’s the only viable option.
    ******

    Mr. Dick can believe what he wants, but economic reality will, without doubt, have the final say.

    Thursday, November 11, 2010

    Veterans Day Salute

    No matter how many times I read this, I feel a swell of emotion and pride:


    ******
    "Nineteen forty-five was the worst year in human history - more people killed, more buildings destroyed, more high explosives, more fires than ever before or since. In 1945, the sight of a group of teenage Germans or Japanese or Red Army troops, in uniform and armed, brought terror to civilians in France, Belgium, Holland, Korea, the Philippines, China, Germany, Poland, and elsewhere. It brought terror because those squads of teen-age soldiers meant rape, pillage, looting, wanton murder, and senseless destruction. There was an exception: a squad of teen-age soldiers of democracy, in uniform and armed - because that squad meant candy, C-rations, cigarettes, and freedom. That was true in France, Belgium, Italy, the Philippines, China, even Germany, and, after August 1945, Japan. We had sent the best of our young men halfway around the world, in both directions, not to conquer, not to destroy, not to rule, but to liberate." (Stephen E. Ambrose, "The Lasting Legacy of World War II," One of Freedom's Finest Hours, Hillsdale College Press: Hillsdale, Michigan, 2002, p. 6)
    ******

    Have another great day in the land of liberty!

    Wednesday, November 10, 2010

    Dishonoring the Greatest Generation

    If you happen to love America and if you happen to honor the role of American military men and women in securing and protecting freedom around the world, then you’ll want to sit down, relax, and take a few deep breaths before continuing. If you use it, make sure that you have taken your blood pressure medicine. Why preface my article with all this? Simple. This will raise your blood pressure and leave you boiling mad.


    In July 2010, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) sponsored a workshop entitled “History and Commemoration: The Legacies of the Pacific War.” College professors from across the nation were chosen to attend the seminars held at the University of Hawaii. Expecting an opportunity to visit impressive sites commemorating the American victory over tyranny, as well as meeting with other scholars who shared her interest in this facet of World War II history, Professor Penelope Blake experienced quite a different event.

    In her own words, Professor Blake states:

    ******
    In my thirty years as a professor in upper education, I have never witnessed nor participated in a more extremist, agenda-driven, revisionist conference, nearly devoid of rhetorical balance and historical context for the arguments presented.
    ******

    In a letter written to her Congressman specifically requesting that taxpayer funding be withdrawn from the NEH, Professor Blake delineated several points demonstrating the intent of the presenters at this NEH sponsored workshop to disparage and dishonor the spirit and integrity of United States military personnel in general and the “Greatest Generation” in particular:

    ******
    1. The U.S. military and its veterans constitute an imperialistic, oppressive force which has created and perpetuated its own mythology of liberation and heroism, insisting on a "pristine collective memory" of the war.

    2. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor should be seen from the perspective of Japan being a victim of western oppression.

    3. War memorials, such as the Punchbowl National Memorial Cemetery (where many WWII dead are buried, including those executed by the Japanese on Wake Island and the beloved American journalist Ernie Pyle), are symbols of military aggression and brutality "that pacify death, sanitize war and enable future wars to be fought."

    4. The U.S. military has repeatedly committed rapes and other violent crimes throughout its past through the present day.

    5. Those misguided members of the WWII generation on islands like Guam and Saipan who feel gratitude to the Americans for saving them from the Japanese are blinded by propaganda supporting "the image of a compassionate America" or by their own advanced age.

    6. It was "the practice" of the U.S. military in WWII to desecrate and disrespect the bodies of dead Japanese.

    7. Conservatives and veterans in the U.S. have had an undue and corrupt influence on how WWII is remembered.

    8. Conservatives are reactionary nationalists (no distinction was made between nationalism and patriotism), pro-military "tea baggers" who are incapable of "critical thinking."

    9. Relating to the above, even members of the NEH review board are not immune to "reactionary" pro-military views.

    10. Veterans' memories of their own experiences in the war are suspect and influenced by media and their own self-delusion.

    11. War memorials like the Arizona Memorial should be recast as "peace memorials," sensitive to all viewers from all countries, especially the many visitors from Japan.
    ******

    Professor Blake did a magnificent job rebutting each of the points she includes in her letter.

    Shortly before discovering this report about the NEH workshop, I finished reading “Citizen Soldiers” by historian Stephen E. Ambrose. Early in the book, within the first one hundred pages or so, Ambrose included accounts of some atrocities committed by American soldiers. Most of the incidents centered around the shooting of surrendering enemy and unarmed prisoners. Ambrose points out throughout his book that these types of atrocities were isolated and were not systemic to the general command structure of American forces. By the end of the book, as the Allies are making their way across Germany, Ambrose relates that some of the most valiant fighting by German soldiers occurred as they sacrificed themselves to slow the Russian juggernaut so that more of their fellow citizens and soldiers alike could have a chance to surrender to the American forces. They knew that the Americans came to liberate, not dominate.

    Even though the European and Pacific Theaters of Operation presented their respective and unique challenges to young American boys thrust into a brutal global conflict, and even though cruelties by “our boys” have been documented, the final truth is that American combatants liberated island after island from Japanese cruelty and, in the end, liberated Japan itself from the totalitarian grip of brutal Imperialists.

    It is a particularly despicable act on the part of these so-called academics who set about to dishonor and desecrate the sacrifice of thousands of young Americans who gave so much in order to not only preserve freedom in America, but to liberate countless others subjected to the tyranny of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany. It is even more despicable that they are allowed to perpetuate their revisionist messages with the aid of taxpayer funding. It should certainly be clear by now to even the most casual observer that those living in the land of left-believe are ultimately bent on crippling America.

    In both protest to this kind of nonsense and in honor of those who have served the cause of liberty and freedom, make a special effort to thank a Veteran and/or active servicemember this Veteran’s Day.

    Thursday, October 28, 2010

    Liberty Over Slavery

    "Today's Quote" in my local newspaper: "I prefer liberty with danger than peace with slavery" (Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Swiss-born French philosopher, 1712-1778)

    I consider this a timely reminder for our day. Too many Americans are being seduced by the power-brokers who invite us to sacrifice a little liberty - and then just a little more - in order to attain security and peace. A glaring sample of this is the health care legislation that has been sold as America's "solution" for universal access to health care. In addition to mounting financial costs, there are also mounting costs to liberty as government herds us into their prescribed forms of health care choices.

    I have written before that lasting liberty demands that we bear the consequences for our behavior. Those who are able to shift the consequences for personal behavior onto other individuals and groups have low, or no, motivation to change and improve. Consequently, liberty is eroded for everyone.

    Everyone I know likes peace and security. I like peace and security. But peace and security without the truthful recognition of the high price of vigilance leads to enslavement. Those who have gone before us - those to whom we owe a debt we cannot pay - knew this full well:

    The time is now near at hand which must probably determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their houses and farms are to be pillaged and destroyed, and themselves consigned to a state of wretchedness from which no human efforts will deliver them.


    The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore to resolve to conquer or die. - General George Washington, order issued July 2, 1776
    As 21st century Americans, we are blessed to have elections through which we can choose liberty or slavery. As with any tool, it is useful only to the extent that we actually use it. So use it.

    Choose liberty over slavery.

    Tuesday, October 19, 2010

    Legislating Death

    Remember when Sarah Palin’s remarks about Obamacare death panels spurred the left on to an overtime apoplectic fit? Her studied remarks were labeled “disgusting” and “outrageous.”

    Leave it to a liberal, though, to actually confirm the accuracy of conservatives’ analysis of social issues. In one recent editorial, “veteran Canadian journailst” Bogdan Kipling writes,

    ******
    Had the Democrats merely listened to the wise counsel of such progressives as Reps. Jim McDermott (D-WA) and Texas maverick Jim Hightower and pressed for single-payer while they had a staggering majority they likely could have avoided all of this.

    From a Canadian perspective, they might be far happier if they had. Yes, the Canadian system has some major flaws, but most of the country's 34-million inhabitants seem relatively happy with it. It provides all the necessities, but few of the expensive frills of the American system.

    Then again most Canadians are hardy enough souls that they have no desire to cling to a life that is not really living. What could be more horrendous than to be kept alive for a few more months by excruciatingly painful operations that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars? What could be more undignified at the end of the life than to have a nursing-care attendant wake you up to wipe dribble from your chin? And what could be more heartrending than have your family and loved ones see you in such a pathetic condition?

    When it comes to prolonging life beyond its normal range, Americans might do well to remember Shakespeare's immortal lines in Julius Caesar: "Cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once."

    Suck it up America! By the time the ObamaCare disaster craps out; you're going to have to.
    ******

    Yes, leave it to the left to determine that they are the best arbiters of what the “normal range” of life is. Being the elitist liberal that he is, of course Kipling perceives that Canadian citizens are “relatively happy” with their national rationed health care. That is the system that has been foisted onto them – for their own good, of course. With no choice, what else are they going to do but to “seem relatively happy” with it and “suck it up?”

    But then, some Canadians take advantage of the ability to supplement their rationed “no frills” health care with American treatment by making the trip across the border to receive services in a more timely manner. Perhaps those who the Canadian system has determined are exceeding the “normal range” of life seek a second opinion.

    Sure, at some point a person or family might have to decide when further care and treatment is fruitless. The dangerous arrogance lodged in Obamacare and all the other socialist style, government-run health care systems is that a government has the capability and the imperative to make that life-and-death decision in place of the patient and family.

    Even though the left continually want to make Palin and other conservatives out to be backwater know-nothings, whose analysis of today’s issues always ultimately ring true?